Case digest hornilla vs atty salunat

Below is a digest of the salient points made by the Court, thus:

Case digest hornilla vs atty salunat

Statutory Construction Disclaimer Any opinion, information or remark made on this site, including any response to queries or comments posted, should not be regarded as a complete and authoritative statement of the law.

This site is only meant as a resource to aid students and researchers on their legal studies. This blog was started by the owner, Howard Chan, when he was still a law student. He passed the bar exams and was admitted to the bar on April 29, Thus, distinctions must be made between posts, comments, and opinions made by the author before and after admission to the bar.

Any posts, comments, and opinions posted herein by the author is in no way and should never be construed as attributable to said law office. Any posts, comments, and opinions posted herein by the author is in no way and should never be construed as attributable to the Public Attorney's Office.

Digests and other resources within this site are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License unless otherwise indicated.On November 21, , Benedicto Hornilla and Federico D.

Ricafort filed an administrative complaint with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Commission on Bar Discipline, against respondent Atty. Ernesto S. Salunat for illegal and unethical. On November 21, , Benedicto Hornilla and Federico D.

Ricafort filed an administrative complaint [1] with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Commission on Bar Discipline, against respondent Atty. Ernesto S. Salunat for illegal and unethical practice and conflict of interest. Sep 30,  · In the case of LETICIA GONZALES vs.

Case digest hornilla vs atty salunat

ATTY. MARCELINO CABUCANA, A.C. No. , January 23, , Rule 03 was intended “ to avoid the appearance of treachery and double-dealing for only then can litigants be encouraged to entrust their secrets to their lawyers, which is of paramount importance in the administration of justice.”. Sep 30,  · In the case of LETICIA GONZALES vs.

ATTY. MARCELINO CABUCANA, A.C. No. , January 23, , Rule 03 was intended “ to avoid the appearance of treachery and double-dealing for only then can litigants be encouraged to entrust their secrets to their lawyers, which is of paramount importance in the administration of justice.”.

hornilla vs salunat READ CASE DIGEST HERE. Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila FIRST DIVISION A.C. No. July 1, BENEDICTO HORNILLA and ATTY. BENEDICTO HORNILLA and ATTY.

FEDERICO D. RICAFORT, complainants vs. iridis-photo-restoration.comO S. SALUNAT, respondents A.C. No. July 1, TOPIC: Conflict of Interest.

Rule A lawyer shall not represent conflicting interests except bywritten consent of all concerned given after a .

HORNILLA vs SALUNAT | Uber Digests