The controversy surrounding the use of saccharin

See Article History Alternative Title:

The controversy surrounding the use of saccharin

Request a Review There are no miracle cure-alls, silver bullets, or magic pills that will get you trim, fit and healthy, but after an exhaustive search and rigorous testingThe Sherpa has pinpointed a few natural health therapies that DO help and ferreted out the scams to avoid The Sherpa Posted Tuesday, Mar.

Would you happily sip it down or gleefully sprinkle it on your morning cereal? But what if I told you it was sweet? As in times sweeter than sugar. Not only have you likely eaten or drank this mysterious coal-derived sweetener, it graces virtually every table in restaurants across the country.

It was first produced in by a chemist working on coal tar derivatives at Johns Hopkins University. Today, saccharin is commonly manufactured by combining anthranilic acid used among other things as a corrosive agent for metal with nitrous acid, sulfur dioxide, chlorine, and ammonia.

In fact, that particular group of chemicals sounds more like a recipe for a household cleaner than a sweetener.

Saccharin: Avoid This Artificial Sweetener (Made From Coal Tar) | iridis-photo-restoration.com

And yet, millions upon millions of people consume saccharin every year. Harvey Wiley, the director of the bureau of chemistry for the USDA during that time, felt saccharin should not be used in foods.

Inthere was much discussion about the dangers of saccharin, but inan investigation into those claims found little scientific proof to warrant the concerns. Yet, there must have been something because three years later, inthe FDA tried to ban saccharin.

Cancer causing, necessary warning label, etc. In latethe FDA removed the warning labels after studies showed that the rats have a completely different chemical make up to their urine.

The controversy surrounding the use of saccharin

And it is this particular combination of high pH, high calcium phosphate, and high protein that interacts with saccharin and damages the bladder walls. And this damage is what leads to increased cancer risk, not the saccharin itself.

In fact, bysaccharin was been taken off nearly every carcinogenic list, from the U. But should it have been? As I discussed, there are the rodent studies showing that saccharin caused bladder cancer, not to mention vascular and lung cancer.

It also increased the risk of uterine cancer in female mice. There in lies the issue. No one is willing to do a double blind, placebo-controlled study with saccharin, as it would be imprudent to knowingly place someone at risk.

But there are several case-controlled studies showing a definitive link between saccharin consumption and increased risk of cancer. First of all, the National Cancer Institute noted a 10 percent increase in the incidence of bladder cancer and An analysis of nearly 1, cases found that heavy use of artificial sweeteners was associated with increased risk of bladder cancer.

Give me a break! Or perhaps irony is a better word. They just rinsed their mouth out with it. As we all know, increased insulin levels is a risk factor for both obesity and diabetes.

Saccharin: Avoid This Artificial Sweetener (Made From Coal Tar) | iridis-photo-restoration.com

Probably NOT the side effect dieters and diabetics are going for when they choose a sugar-free product. Use Your Brain… So, what do you do? But it clearly has documented health risks and concerns, ranging from allergies to cancer to increased insulin levels.

So what do you do?In , they stated that foods with saccharin were “adulterated,” then in , said that saccharin wasn’t harmful. In , there was much discussion about the dangers of saccharin, but in , an investigation into those claims found little scientific proof to warrant the concerns. Saccharin and its salts are the most extensively consumed artificial sweeteners in the United States today.

The current controversy about the risks of their use to human health has surfaced from research findings that report an increased incidence of cancer, primarily of the urinary bladder, in.

Saccharin and cyclamate have been around the longest, and both were eventually linked to cancer in laboratory mice and rats. Studies associating saccharin with bladder cancer may have spurred the long-term perception that .

Saccharin: Saccharin,, organic compound employed as a non-nutritive sweetening agent. It occurs as insoluble saccharin or in the form of various salts, primarily sodium and calcium.

Saccharin has about – times the sweetening power of granulated sugar and has a slightly bitter and metallic aftertaste. Saccharin and its salts are the most extensively consumed artificial sweeteners in the United States today.

The current controversy about the risks of their use to human health has surfaced from research findings that report an increased incidence of cancer, primarily of the urinary bladder, in certain animal species and man chronically exposed to these agents.

The First Sweetener Controversy – Saccharine Linked to Cancer But when studies at the time started finding a link between saccharin and bladder cancer in lab rats, Aspartame has been the primary sweetener in diet soda products for years, but against the backdrop of lawsuits and controversy surrounding this sweetener, sales have been.

Sugar substitutes: Health controversy over perceived benefits